17 June, 2009

New build - 2.3.0.35109

The installer with new version was uploaded. You may download it here

Changes:
* allocation of counters was changed
* IL-body of method is masured even it was never called from target code
* method body is instrumented only before jitting
Автор: partcover
Ярлыки: , ,

9 comments:

  1. Anonymous21 July 2009 at 12:31

    Привет, залей исходники на сурсфорж в свн (ну или на гуглкод), вроде как самая простая в использовании система контроля версий:)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Unknown12 August 2009 at 09:44

    Any ideas on this error please?

    C:> "c:\Program Files (x86)\Gubka Bob\PartCover .NET 2.3\PartCover.exe" --target NUnit\2.4.8\bin
    \nunit-console.exe
    Retrieving the COM class factory for component with CLSID {FB20430E-CDC9-45D7-84
    53-272268002E08} failed due to the following error: 80040153.
    at PartCover.Framework.Connector..ctor()
    at PartCover.ApplicationEntry.Main(String[] args)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Stanislav Perekrestov4 September 2009 at 17:39

    Running PartCover.exe on x64

    If you run it, you'll get the following error message:

    Retrieving the COM class factory for component with CLSID {FB20430E-CDC9-45D7-8453-272268002E08} failed due to the following error: 80040153.

    This is because the COM class requested is 32-bit only, and PartCover is running as a 64-bit app. To fix it, you'll need to use CORFLAGS:

    "%VS90COMNTOOLS%\vsvars32"
    CORFLAGS /32BIT+ /FORCE path\to\partcover.exe

    ReplyDelete
  4. Unknown5 October 2009 at 16:12

    corflags shows this error:

    corflags : warning CF011 : The specified file is strong name signed. Using /Force will invalidate the signature of this image and will require the assembly tobe resigned.

    usage without force command throw this:

    corflags : error CF012 : The specified file is strong name signed. Use /Force to force the update.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Unknown6 October 2009 at 14:20

    I like PartCover. I use 2.3.0.35109. However I newer got html-report to work. It creates a .html file with one line only. Can anyone help me? It is the same using ... by assembly and ... by class.

    Morten

    ReplyDelete
  6. Unknown11 November 2009 at 23:02

    What advantages does PartCover have over NCover? I don't see much information on this website.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Qwertie30 March 2010 at 17:59

    PartCover is not working on my code. A small number of classes are handled correctly, but the majority cause errors like the following and record 0% coverage:

    [04016] [02980] GetClassIDInfo failed for .ExtractCurrent
    [04016] [02980] GetClassIDInfo failed for .MoveFirst
    [04016] [02980] GetClassIDInfo failed for .get_Current
    [04016] [02980] GetClassIDInfo failed for .get_CurrentKey
    [04016] [02980] GetClassIDInfo failed for .DecodeInt
    [04016] [02980] GetClassIDInfo failed for .get_CurrentValue
    [04016] [02980] GetClassIDInfo failed for .MoveNext
    [04016] [02980] GetClassIDInfo failed for .MoveNext2
    [04016] [02980] GetClassIDInfo failed for .MoveNext
    [04031] [02980] GetClassIDInfo failed for .Dispose
    [04031] [02980] GetClassIDInfo failed for .FindAtLeast
    [04031] [02980] GetClassIDInfo failed for .Find
    [04031] [02980] GetClassIDInfo failed for .Reset
    ...

    ReplyDelete
  8. Qwertie30 March 2010 at 18:08

    Oh, I see. The problem is that PartCover does not support generic classes. Is this hard to fix?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Shaun7 July 2010 at 03:37

    PartCover now handles .NET 4.0 and generic classes

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)